← priced_lineedges · WNBA
2026-08-24
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: priced_lineedges.
15–13 · 54% · −1.48u across the last 1 days · 2 voided, zero benchmark units
08/2415–13 ·2 void54%−1.48u2 games
GSV @ MIN6–9−4.30u
- Kayla McBride Under 2.5 AST4 vs 2.5paid over the fair numberMcBride exceeded the assist prop despite shooting just 18% from the field, relying on her playmaking (4 ast in 33 min) rather than scoring to impact the game—a rare occurrence that undermined the under bet.
- Cecilia Zandalasini Over 1.5 AST1 vs 1.5no clean explanationZandalasini's playmaking dried up despite heavy usage (30%) and 30 minutes; she generated just 1 assist while shouldering a scoring load (18 pts on 7-17 FG), suggesting she operated primarily as a scorer rather than a facilitator in this game. Four personal fouls also may have limited her ability to push tempo and create in transition.
- Maya Caldwell Under 5.5 PTS9 vs 5.5paid over the fair numberCaldwell's 3-for-5 three-point shooting (60%) and near-perfect 90% true shooting overcame modest 25 minutes and 11% usage, as efficient scoring made the under vulnerable to even modest volume. She needed just 9 points to bust a 5.5 line, and elite efficiency made that threshold easier to clear than expected.
- Kayla McBride Under 2.5 REB4 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMcBride grabbed 4 boards despite a poor 2-11 shooting night, staying on the floor for all 33 minutes and maintaining active rebounding work even as her offensive touches dried up. The volume was there to hit the over, and she delivered on the glass despite shooting just 18% from the field.
- Veronica Burton Under 6.5 AST9 vs 6.5paid over the fair numberBurton's playmaking dominated the game despite modest usage; she notched 9 assists in 30 minutes—well above the 6.5 line—by running the offense efficiently with just 1 turnover and forcing 5 steals that generated transition opportunities.
- Olivia Miles Over 19.5 PTS8 vs 19.5shots didn't fall — the read held upMiles shot just 3-12 from the field (25% FG) and 1-5 from three on 29% usage, combining for historically poor efficiency (31% TS%) that made it impossible to reach 19.5 despite playing 28 minutes. The offensive struggles were across the board—she couldn't generate scoring opportunities and converted few of the looks she did get.
ATL @ LAS9–4 ·2 void+2.82u
- Erica Wheeler Over 3.5 AST3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberWheeler came up one assist short despite playing 25 minutes, finishing with just 3 dimes as her offensive inefficiency (1-6 FG, 15% usage) limited her ability to generate ball movement and create scoring opportunities off the bench.
- Erica Wheeler Over 8.5 PTS2 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held upWheeler's ice-cold 1-6 shooting (17% TS) left her well short despite 25 minutes of run, as she managed just 2 points on 15% usage in a game where she couldn't find her rhythm from the field.
- Erica Wheeler Over 7.5 PTS2 vs 7.5no clean explanationWheeler's abysmal 1-6 shooting (17% TS%) left her with just 2 points despite playing 25 minutes, as she couldn't convert opportunities in an efficient offensive system. The combination of poor shot selection and execution—missing all six attempts—made the 7.5-point line unreachable.
- Isobel Borlase Under 5.5 PTS6 vs 5.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationBorlase's 2-of-8 shooting (25% FG) left little margin for error on the 5.5-point line, and she converted both free throws to reach 6 points despite the poor offensive efficiency. The 16 minutes of playing time gave her enough volume to narrowly exceed the under threshold despite a putrid 34% true shooting night.
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.