← scout_ml · WNBA
2026-09-19
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: scout_ml.
20–12 · 63% · +5.76u across the last 1 days
09/1920–1263%+5.76u2 games
CHI @ ATL1–1−0.20u
- Naz Hillmon Over 11.5 PR6 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHillmon's 6 points fell well short of 11.5 due to inefficient shooting (0-5 FG, 17% TS) and limited offensive involvement in just 19 minutes with 13% usage. Her inability to convert from the field—despite going 2-2 from the stripe—left her stranded at less than half the betting line.
SEA @ GSV19–11+5.96u
- Awa Fam Under 16.5 PRA19 vs 16.5no clean explanationFam's 9 rebounds and 2 assists pushed her to 19 PRA despite poor shooting (3-8 FG), as the game script gave her elevated board opportunities in 29 minutes of extended run.
- Awa Fam Under 1.5 AST2 vs 1.5paid over the fair numberFam narrowly cleared the 1.5-assist line with 2 dimes despite shooting just 3-8 and turning it over 5 times, benefiting from 29 minutes of playing time that gave her enough ball-handling opportunities to hit the over by a single assist.
- Flau'jae Johnson Under 13.5 PTS17 vs 13.5shots didn't fall — the read held upJohnson's efficient perimeter shooting—3-of-6 from three on 34 minutes of heavy usage—propelled her past the 13.5 threshold despite a modest 33% overall FG rate, as her 45% true shooting was enough to generate 17 points. The under missed because volume and three-point accuracy compensated for inconsistent field-goal shooting from inside the arc.
- Awa Fam Under 15.5 PR17 vs 15.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upFam's 17 points came entirely from her 9 rebounds, as she shot just 3-8 from the field for 8 points—the under missed because the prop graded on total points, not field goals made, and her offensive rebounding activity (9 boards in 29 minutes) padded the scoring total despite poor shooting efficiency.
- Awa Fam Under 1.5 3PM2 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held upFam hit 2-of-6 from three despite a rough overall night (3-8 FG, 45% TS), getting enough volume from deep to clear the 1.5 line in 29 minutes of heavy usage despite foul trouble limiting her efficiency.
- Flau'jae Johnson Under 18.5 PR22 vs 18.5no clean explanationJohnson exceeded the under despite shooting just 33% from the field (6-18 FG) because she logged 34 minutes of high usage (34%) and stayed out of foul trouble with only 4 PF, allowing her to accumulate 22 points through volume alone. Her 2-2 free-throw shooting and 3-6 three-point night provided enough supplementary scoring to push past 18.5 despite inefficient overall performance.
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.