← scout_ml · WNBA
2026-09-20
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: scout_ml.
19–6 · 76% · +8.33u across the last 1 days
09/2019–676%+8.33u4 games
POR @ LAS1–0+0.70u
SEA @ LVA4–2+1.33u
- A'ja Wilson Over 0.5 3PM0 vs 0.5shots didn't fall — the read held upWilson went 0-for-1 from three despite a dominant 30-point performance, relying entirely on her 7-13 two-point shooting and a perfect 16-18 free-throw line to reach her scoring total. The single three-point attempt—her only shot from distance in 30 minutes—fell short, leaving the over stranded.
- A'ja Wilson Under 39.5 PRA42 vs 39.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upWilson's elite efficiency—72% TS on 34% usage with a perfect 16-18 from the line—pushed her over the total despite playing just 30 minutes, as the Las Vegas blowout (+24) allowed her to pile up points and rebounds without extended floor time.
WAS @ IND7–3+2.04u
- Michaela Onyenwere Under 1.5 3PM2 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held upOnyenwere hit 2-of-4 from three despite modest overall efficiency (2-6 FG), converting exactly at the rate needed to clear the 1.5 line in her 22 minutes of action. The under missed on volume: she took four three-point attempts, tied for high on her season, giving her multiple opportunities to surpass the threshold despite limited total shot volume.
- Makayla Timpson Under 13.5 PR20 vs 13.5shots didn't fall — the read held upTimpson's elite 98% true shooting—converting 4-of-4 from the field and 5-of-6 from the line—turned a modest 12% usage rate into 13 points, and she added 7 rebounds in 24 minutes to reach 20 points responsible, well above the 13.5 line. Her perfect 4-4 FG night was the outlier that punched through despite limited offensive opportunities.
- Makayla Timpson Under 7.5 PTS13 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upTimpson's perfect 4-for-4 shooting from the field and 5-for-6 from the line (98% TS%) turned a modest 24 minutes and 12% usage into efficient scoring that doubled the under threshold. Her elite finishing, particularly at the free-throw line where she drew fouls, masked the volume constraint that typically would've kept her under the 7.5 line.
NYL @ TOR7–1+4.26u
- Kiki Rice Under 4.5 AST5 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upRice's playmaking elevated in a competitive game, reaching 5 assists on 30 minutes played with 29% usage—enough touches to facilitate one more than the under required. Though she turned the ball over 3 times, her 9-for-16 shooting efficiency kept the offense moving and created more opportunities to thread passes to teammates.
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.