← consensus_wnba · WNBA

2026-08-25

Day by day

Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: consensus_wnba.

18–22 · 45% · −9.49u across the last 1 days

08/2518–2245%−9.49u3 games
WAS @ PHO5–9−5.62u
  • Noemie Brochant Over 2.5 REB1 vs 2.5paid over the fair number
  • Alyssa Thomas Over 8.5 REB6 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Shakira Austin Over 9.5 REB6 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Kelsey Plum Over 13.5 PTS10 vs 13.5shots didn't fall — the read held upPlum's 10 points fell short of 13.5 as she shot just 4-12 FG (33%) in limited 17-minute action, and a five-foul performance (matching her minutes) likely kept her off the floor down the stretch in what became a blowout (-18 +/-).
  • Shakira Austin Over 17.5 PTS16 vs 17.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upAustin fell just short despite efficient 7-11 shooting (64% FG) because limited free-throw attempts (2-5) and 24 minutes of action left her one point shy of the over. Her 28% usage rate and lack of three-point volume meant she needed a perfect night from the line to clear 17.5, and two makes there weren't enough.
  • Alyssa Thomas Over 7.5 REB6 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upThomas fell one board short despite solid efficiency (8-13 FG) and heavy involvement (32 min, 10 ast), likely limited by foul trouble (4 PF) that may have made her more cautious on the glass in a blowout loss (-13 +/-).
POR @ DAL6–8−3.34u
  • Awak Kuier Under 1.5 3PM2 vs 1.5paid over the fair number
  • Jessica Shepard Under 4.5 AST6 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Jessica Shepard Under 14.5 PTS21 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Bridget Carleton Over 2.5 3PM2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Bridget Carleton Over 14.5 PTS14 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Paige Bueckers Under 6.5 AST11 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upBueckers nearly doubled the assist line with 11 dimes, thriving in a game where UConn dominated (+26) and she played all 33 available minutes without foul trouble, creating easy looks for teammates in a blowout environment.
CHI @ CON7–5−0.53u
  • Natasha Cloud Over 3.5 REB0 vs 3.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Natasha Cloud Over 12.5 PTS3 vs 12.5paid over the fair number
  • Sydney Taylor Over 1.5 3PM0 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Saniya Rivers Under 4.5 AST5 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upRivers pushed over the line with exactly 5 assists despite shooting just 3-10 and posting poor efficiency (35% TS), relying on playmaking volume rather than scoring to stay productive in 29 minutes.
  • Sydney Taylor Over 12.5 PTS4 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held upTaylor's shooting was catastrophic, going 2-11 from the field (18% TS%) with an 0-6 three-point night in 20 minutes, making it mathematically impossible to reach 12.5 points. Despite moderate usage (25%), her inability to convert any perimeter shots and reliance on made field goals left her 8.5 points short of the over.

Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.