← consensus_wnba · WNBA
2026-09-17
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: consensus_wnba.
18–20 · 47% · −6.85u across the last 1 days
09/1718–2047%−6.85u4 games
CON @ ATL5–10−5.81u
- Jordin Canada Over 6.5 AST1 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Angel Reese Over 12.5 REB10 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Aaliyah Edwards Over 5.5 REB4 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Angel Reese Under 15.5 PTS30 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Allisha Gray Over 1.5 3PM0 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Jordin Canada Over 0.5 3PM0 vs 0.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
LVA @ SEA4–4−1.44u
- A'ja Wilson Under 25.5 PTS29 vs 25.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Jackie Young Under 20.5 PTS35 vs 20.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Dominique Malonga Over 8.5 REB6 vs 8.5no clean explanation
- Chelsea Gray Under 3.5 REB9 vs 3.5shots didn't fall — the read held upGray crashed the glass hard despite minimal offensive involvement, pulling down 9 rebounds in 26 minutes—more than double the projected total—as a primary rebounder in a game where Las Vegas controlled pace and rebounding opportunities.
LAS @ DAL4–4−0.93u
- Paige Bueckers Over 19.5 PTS19 vs 19.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair number
- Dearica Hamby Over 1.5 AST1 vs 1.5paid over the fair number
- Rae Burrell Over 14.5 PTS12 vs 14.5paid over the fair numberBurrell shot just 5-14 from the field (36%) and 1-4 from three despite 24 minutes and 27% usage, falling two points short of the 14.5 line. Her inefficient shooting night, combined with limited free-throw attempts (1-1), prevented her from reaching the scoring threshold.
- Jessica Shepard Under 5.5 AST12 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held upShepard's playmaking was the engine of her impact despite modest scoring, dishing 12 assists on 28 minutes of floor time while maintaining efficiency (55% TS%) and recording a team-leading +18, nearly doubling the 5.5 assist line. Her ball movement and high-volume involvement in the offense—facilitated by low foul trouble (2 PF)—drove her well above the projection.
WAS @ CHI5–2+1.34u
- Kiki Iriafen Under 17.5 PTS18 vs 17.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 12.5 PTS10 vs 12.5paid over the fair numberCardoso fell short of 12.5 despite solid volume (11 FG attempts), hampered by poor efficiency at 45.5% TS and zero free-throw attempts that limited her scoring upside. Foul trouble (6 PF in 23 minutes) likely curtailed her aggression and playing time in a blowout loss.
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.