← disciplined_board · WNBA
2026-08-21
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: disciplined_board.
18–12 · 60% · +3.72u across the last 1 days
08/2118–1260%+3.72u3 games
MIN @ WAS5–5−0.90u
- Lauren Betts Over 4.5 REB1 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held upBetts played only 13 minutes and grabbed just 1 rebound, falling 4 short of the over; limited run and low usage (10%) kept her well below the 4.5 threshold despite the playing time she did receive.
- Kayla McBride Under 2.5 AST3 vs 2.5no clean explanationMcBride hit the over with a modest 3 assists despite moderate usage (20%), as she played all 35 minutes and operated as a secondary ball-handler in an efficient offensive game where Las Vegas's spacing kept defenses honest.
- Olivia Miles Over 3.5 REB3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upMiles fell one board short despite heavy offensive involvement (42% usage, 29 min), as her scoring creation (24 pts, 7 ast) came primarily through perimeter shooting rather than interior activity, and five personal fouls limited her ability to crash the glass aggressively.
- Natasha Howard Under 13.5 PTS21 vs 13.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHoward torched the under on an efficient 10-12 shooting night (83% FG), scoring 21 points in 33 minutes while staying out of foul trouble with just 4 PF. Her elite finishing around the rim—particularly on high-volume close-range attempts—turned what looked like a modest usage rate (20%) into well above the 13.5-point threshold.
- Shakira Austin Over 17.5 PTS17 vs 17.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upAustin fell one point short despite solid efficiency (58% TS on 27% usage), as her 7-13 shooting output simply didn't generate enough volume to clear 17.5 in 34 minutes of play. She needed just one more made field goal to hit the over, but came up one shot short.
POR @ TOR6–4+1.01u
- Brittney Sykes Over 13.5 PTS0 vs 13.5game script — blowout or foul troubleSykes played just 2 minutes with 1 personal foul, effectively sidelined early and unable to contribute on the scoresheet. With minimal court time and zero shot attempts, she couldn't approach the 13.5-point threshold despite the 30% usage rate context.
- Isabelle Harrison Over 1.5 AST1 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHarrison recorded only 1 assist despite heavy offensive usage (38%) and 28 minutes, as she functioned primarily as a scorer and rebounder rather than a playmaker in this game. Her assist-to-usage rate fell well short of what the over implied, with most of her 25 points coming from direct scoring rather than ball movement.
- Emily Engstler Under 9.5 PTS13 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held upEngstler exceeded the 9.5-point line despite shooting just 38% from the field, benefiting from elevated usage (22%) and 30 minutes of floor time that provided enough volume to reach 13 points on modest efficiency.
- Bridget Carleton Over 4.5 REB4 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationCarleton fell one rebound short despite 33 minutes and solid offensive efficiency (61% TS), as she logged just 4 boards in a game where her 22% usage rate limited her overall volume and rebounding opportunities.
GSV @ CHI7–3+3.61u
- Courtney Vandersloot Over 2.5 REB1 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upVandersloot grabbed just 1 rebound despite playing 29 minutes, well below the 2.5 line—a stark departure from her usual rebounding activity and likely attributable to limited offensive rebounding opportunities and her primary role as a floor-running guard rather than a glass-cleaner.
- Natasha Cloud Over 4.5 AST4 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upCloud fell one assist short despite heavy usage (36 min, 20% usage rate), held back by a quiet playmaking night—she recorded four turnovers and didn't generate the extra helper needed to push past 4.5.
- Kayla Thornton Over 6.5 PTS0 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upThornton's OVER 6.5 missed badly as she went scoreless on just 2 shot attempts in 19 minutes, posting 0% TS and a 5% usage rate that left her virtually out of the offensive flow. The combination of limited touches and cold shooting (0-2 FG) made any scoring production impossible.
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.