← disciplined_board · WNBA
2026-08-23
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: disciplined_board.
25–8 · 76% · +11.68u across the last 1 days
08/2325–876%+11.68u4 games
WAS @ POR2–1+0.65u
- Bridget Carleton Over 4.5 REB4 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upCarleton fell one rebound short despite heavy volume (36 min, 18% usage), as her elite offensive efficiency (64% TS%, 8-14 FG) kept her ball-dominant in a way that limited rebounding opportunities relative to her playing time.
IND @ CHI8–5+0.69u
- Sydney Taylor Over 1.5 REB0 vs 1.5no clean explanationTaylor drew 3 fouls in 18 minutes, limiting her rebounding opportunities and forcing her to play cautiously on the glass; combined with poor shooting (2-9 FG, 0-6 3PT), she generated zero boards despite moderate usage at 25%.
- Monique Billings Under 4.5 REB5 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationBillings grabbed exactly 5 rebounds in 19 minutes, just clearing the 4.5 bar despite modest offensive involvement (16% usage); she was efficient on the glass relative to her limited shot diet and playing time.
- Caitlin Clark Under 25.5 PTS37 vs 25.5shots didn't fall — the read held upClark torched the line on elite efficiency, shooting 54% from three and 75% overall on high volume (41% usage) with zero fouls allowing her to stay on the court all 32 minutes. The combination of hot shooting and unrestricted playing time pushed her well past 25.5 points.
- Sydney Taylor Over 14.5 PTS4 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held upTaylor's shot completely abandoned her, connecting on just 2-of-9 from the field and 0-of-6 from three for a 22% true shooting percentage in 18 minutes. The combination of brutal efficiency and limited playing time (likely due to three fouls) left her far short of the 14.5-point line.
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 8.5 REB6 vs 8.5no clean explanationCardoso fell short of 8.5 boards with just 6 rebounds despite 24 minutes of run, hampered by early foul trouble (5 PF) that limited her interior presence and a lopsided team performance (-31 +/-) that kept Chicago out of rebounding situations.
SEA @ DAL7–1+4.41u
- Jessica Shepard Under 10.5 REB11 vs 10.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upShepard grabbed 11 rebounds in 27 minutes, exceeding the 10.5 line by one despite modest offensive efficiency (5-11 FG); her workload on the glass was enough to push the under just over the edge.
LVA @ TOR8–1+5.93u
- Julie Allemand Over 4.5 AST2 vs 4.5no clean explanationAllemand's limited 15-minute run and 16% usage rate left her well short of assist opportunities, while 2 turnovers in that brief window further dampened her playmaking impact.
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.