← disciplined_board · WNBA
2026-10-04
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: disciplined_board.
11–14 · 44% · −5.62u across the last 1 days
10/0411–1444%−5.62u2 games
LVA @ GSV5–9−5.33u
- Gabby Williams Under 4.5 REB11 vs 4.5no clean explanationWilliams dominated the glass with 11 rebounds across 34 minutes, more than doubling the 4.5 line, as her 31% usage rate and clean foul trouble (0 PF) allowed her to stay on the court and crash consistently on both ends.
- Tiffany Hayes Over 8.5 PTS3 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHayes shot just 1-for-4 from the field and 1-for-4 from the line while logging only 11 minutes, leaving her well short of the 8.5-point line. Her 26% true shooting and limited floor time were the primary culprits in a significant underperformance.
- Tiffany Hayes Over 1.5 AST0 vs 1.5no clean explanationHayes played only 11 minutes with minimal ball-handling duties, recording zero assists despite 27% usage—her limited floor time and low-volume role made the 1.5 assist threshold unattainable. The poor shooting efficiency (26% TS%) likely further limited her playmaking opportunities.
- Kaila Charles Over 4.5 PTS2 vs 4.5no clean explanationCharles went 1-for-5 from the field with zero free-throw attempts despite 18 minutes of play, posting a 20% true shooting percentage that fell well short of the 4.5-point threshold.
- Tiffany Hayes Over 7.5 PTS3 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHayes shot just 1-for-4 from the field and 1-for-4 from the free-throw line while playing only 11 minutes, combining for a 26% true shooting percentage that made scoring difficult despite a reasonable usage rate of 27%.
- Kaila Charles Over 3.5 REB2 vs 3.5shots didn't fall — the read held upCharles logged only 18 minutes and managed just 2 rebounds despite a +7 rating, suggesting limited opportunity and low offensive involvement (13% usage) rather than foul trouble or benching due to poor play. She fell one board short of the 3.5 line in a game where her floor time and rebounding chances simply didn't materialize.
NYL @ ATL6–5−0.29u
- Sabrina Ionescu Under 15.5 PTS27 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held upIonescu torched the under, shooting 10-20 from the field (50%) and 3-8 from three while logging 34 minutes and commanding 35% usage—well above what's needed to clear 15.5 points. Her elite 62% true shooting efficiency and high volume made the under untenable.
- Jonquel Jones Under 2.5 AST4 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held upJones exceeded the 2.5 assists line by dishing 4 assists while playing a full 32 minutes with elevated usage (17%), as the Liberty leaned on her playmaking from the post more than typical. The under missed despite modest offensive efficiency because she operated as a secondary facilitator alongside heavier volume touches in what appeared to be an offensive system adjustment.
- Sabrina Ionescu Under 14.5 PTS27 vs 14.5no clean explanationIonescu torched the line on 10-20 shooting (50% FG) and 4-4 from the free-throw line, nearly doubling the under projection with her 62% true shooting and elite 35% usage rate over 34 minutes.
- Naz Hillmon Over 6.5 PTS0 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHillmon played heavy minutes (37) but was nearly invisible offensively, going 0-2 from the field with minimal shot attempts (6% usage), rendering her rebounding and assist contributions unable to compensate for a complete scoring drought.
- Sabrina Ionescu Under 16.5 PTS27 vs 16.5no clean explanationIonescu caught fire from the field, shooting 10-20 (50% FG) with efficient 62% true shooting to blow past the 16.5-point line, staying on the floor for 34 minutes with 35% usage despite a blowout loss.
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.