← form_wnba · WNBA
2026-09-17
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: form_wnba.
37–31 · 54% · −2.35u across the last 1 days
09/1737–3154%−2.35u5 games
CON @ ATL6–14−8.08u
- Angel Reese Over 12.5 REB10 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- DeWanna Bonner Over 0.5 3PM0 vs 0.5no clean explanation
- Jordin Canada Over 11.5 PTS5 vs 11.5no clean explanation
- Allisha Gray Over 1.5 3PM0 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Allisha Gray Over 18.5 PTS10 vs 18.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Jordin Canada Over 0.5 3PM0 vs 0.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
WAS @ CHI8–5+0.11u
- Kiki Iriafen Under 17.5 PTS18 vs 17.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Michaela Onyenwere Under 9.5 PTS12 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 14.5 PTS10 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 13.5 PTS10 vs 13.5no clean explanationCardoso's 10 points fell short of 13.5 despite solid volume (11 FG attempts), as she converted just 5 shots (45% FG) and took zero free throws in 23 minutes—a below-average efficiency night that couldn't overcome her limited offensive output. Four fouls in limited minutes also likely restricted her aggressive play late in the game.
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 12.5 PTS10 vs 12.5paid over the fair numberCardoso fell short of 12.5 despite solid volume (11 FG attempts), hampered by poor efficiency at 45.5% TS and zero free-throw attempts that limited her scoring upside. Foul trouble (6 PF in 23 minutes) likely curtailed her aggression and playing time in a blowout loss.
LVA @ SEA7–5+0.82u
- Awa Fam Under 6.5 REB9 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- A'ja Wilson Under 25.5 PTS29 vs 25.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Dominique Malonga Over 8.5 REB6 vs 8.5no clean explanation
- A'ja Wilson Under 26.5 PTS29 vs 26.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberWilson's perfect 10-10 free-throw shooting and elite 69% two-point conversion (8-of-11) powered her to 29 points despite modest usage, as her 83% true shooting easily cleared the 26.5 line. She stayed out of foul trouble with just 3 PF in 29 minutes, allowing her to maintain high-efficiency offense throughout the game.
- Chelsea Gray Under 3.5 REB9 vs 3.5shots didn't fall — the read held upGray crashed the glass hard despite minimal offensive involvement, pulling down 9 rebounds in 26 minutes—more than double the projected total—as a primary rebounder in a game where Las Vegas controlled pace and rebounding opportunities.
PHO @ POR4–2+1.07u
- Alyssa Thomas Under 14.5 PTS18 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Alyssa Thomas Under 15.5 PTS18 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held upThomas torched the under with efficient inside scoring, converting 6 of 8 from the field (75%) while getting to the free-throw line 10 times in 31 minutes, offsetting her zero three-pointers with dominant paint production.
LAS @ DAL12–5+3.74u
- Maddy Siegrist Under 7.5 PTS12 vs 7.5paid over the fair number
- Jessica Shepard Under 10.5 REB11 vs 10.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationShepard grabbed 11 boards in 28 minutes, just clearing the number despite modest 22% usage, as her team's +18 margin and defensive rebounding opportunities kept her in high-volume rebound situations.
- Rae Burrell Over 14.5 PTS12 vs 14.5paid over the fair numberBurrell shot just 5-14 from the field (36%) and 1-4 from three despite 24 minutes and 27% usage, falling two points short of the 14.5 line. Her inefficient shooting night, combined with limited free-throw attempts (1-1), prevented her from reaching the scoring threshold.
- Jessica Shepard Under 5.5 AST12 vs 5.5shots didn't fall — the read held upShepard's playmaking was the engine of her impact despite modest scoring, dishing 12 assists on 28 minutes of floor time while maintaining efficiency (55% TS%) and recording a team-leading +18, nearly doubling the 5.5 assist line. Her ball movement and high-volume involvement in the offense—facilitated by low foul trouble (2 PF)—drove her well above the projection.
- Maddy Siegrist Under 8.5 PTS12 vs 8.5paid over the fair numberSiegrist converted 5 of 10 from the field (50% FG) and 2 of 5 from three for 12 points in 23 minutes, exceeding the 8.5-point line through efficient shooting rather than elevated usage (17%). She stayed out of foul trouble with only 3 personal fouls, allowing her to play her typical role without restriction.
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.