← form_wnba · WNBA

2026-09-18

Day by day

Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: form_wnba.

21–24 · 47% · −8.22u across the last 1 days · 4 voided, zero benchmark units

09/1821–24 ·4 void47%−8.22u3 games
POR @ GSV9–11−4.05u
  • Kaila Charles Under 5.5 REB6 vs 5.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Nyadiew Puoch Under 7.5 PTS11 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Carla Leite Over 14.5 PTS12 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Megan DiLeo Over 13.5 PTS8 vs 13.5no clean explanation
  • Megan DiLeo Over 12.5 PTS8 vs 12.5no clean explanation
  • Kayla Thornton Under 10.5 PTS13 vs 10.5paid over the fair numberThornton exceeded the under despite modest efficiency (4-10 FG), hitting 3-of-8 from three to reach 13 points in 25 minutes with elevated usage at 23%, relying on volume rather than shooting accuracy to push past the 10.5 line.
NYL @ MIN5–6−2.16u
  • Kayla McBride Over 2.5 3PM2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Natasha Howard Over 11.5 PTS11 vs 11.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Leonie Fiebich Over 9.5 PTS3 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Olivia Miles Over 1.5 3PM0 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Courtney Williams Over 3.5 AST2 vs 3.5shots didn't fall — the read held upWilliams played 29 minutes with low usage (19%) in a blowout loss, recording only 2 assists despite 5 rebounds, suggesting limited offensive flow and playmaking opportunities in a game that didn't require sustained ball movement. Five fouls also may have constrained her aggression late, limiting her ability to generate additional assists.
  • Breanna Stewart Under 8.5 REB10 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held upStewart grabbed two boards beyond the line in 38 full minutes of action, capitalizing on her team's offensive rebounding opportunities in a blowout win (+13). Her elite efficiency (58% TS) and high usage kept her on the floor throughout, providing extra chances to clean the glass.
IND @ TOR7–7 ·4 void−2.01u
  • Laura Juskaite Over 4.5 REB3 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Isabelle Harrison Under 14.5 PTS16 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair number
  • Makayla Timpson Over 7.5 PTS4 vs 7.5no clean explanation
  • Caitlin Clark Over 2.5 3PM2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
  • Laura Juskaite Under 12.5 PTS22 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held upJuskaite nearly doubled the 12.5 projection by shooting an efficient 8-15 from the field (53%) with strong free-throw conversion (4-5), combining volume and accuracy to reach 22 points in 30 minutes of heavy usage (28%).
  • Kiki Rice Under 3.5 REB6 vs 3.5no clean explanationRice doubled her rebounding projection with 6 boards in 29 minutes, benefiting from elevated usage (34%) and activity that extended beyond her typical scoring role in a competitive game.

Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.