← form_wnba · WNBA
2026-09-22
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: form_wnba.
26–34 · 43% · −13.17u across the last 1 days
09/2226–3443%−13.17u5 games
LAS @ LVA1–7−6.42u
- Jackie Young Over 21.5 PTS14 vs 21.5paid over the fair number
- A'ja Wilson Under 9.5 REB10 vs 9.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Jackie Young Over 20.5 PTS14 vs 20.5paid over the fair number
- Jackie Young Under 4.5 REB5 vs 4.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held upYoung's heavy 34-minute workload and 27% usage rate—playing nearly the full game as the primary ball-handler—gave her enough opportunities to grab 5 boards despite shooting just 6-16 from the field, pushing past the 4.5 rebound line.
- Rae Burrell Over 15.5 PTS11 vs 15.5paid over the fair numberBurrell's inefficient 4-12 shooting (33% FG) and 0-2 from three combined with modest free-throw volume (3 attempts) left her 4.5 points shy despite 29 minutes of play. Her 29% usage rate proved insufficient to generate the scoring volume needed to clear the 15.5-point threshold.
- Chelsea Gray Under 11.5 PTS17 vs 11.5paid over the fair numberGray torched the under on an efficient 7-12 shooting night (58% FG) with extended 33-minute run, nearly doubling the 11.5-point line at 17 points. Her 68% true shooting and zero fouls allowed her to stay on court and capitalize on a high-volume opportunity despite modest 21% usage.
GSV @ POR3–7−4.41u
- Gabby Williams Under 14.5 PTS17 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Veronica Burton Under 12.5 PTS13 vs 12.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanation
- Kayla Thornton Under 7.5 PTS11 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kayla Thornton Under 3.5 REB7 vs 3.5no clean explanationThornton nearly doubled the over/under by grabbing 7 boards in 26 minutes, benefiting from elevated opportunity on a night when her team needed rebounding help and she drew only 2 fouls despite heavy box-out work.
- Kayla Thornton Under 9.5 PTS11 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held upThornton's efficient 62% true shooting on 20% usage was enough to clear the 9.5-point line, converting 4-of-8 from the field and both her three-point attempts in 26 minutes despite modest volume.
- Kayla Thornton Under 8.5 PTS11 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held upThornton exceeded the under despite modest volume, converting 4-of-8 from the field (50%) and 2-of-4 from three (50%) on 26 minutes to reach 11 points, as efficient shooting made up for her low usage rate of just 20%.
CON @ WAS5–8−3.96u
- Aaliyah Edwards Over 12.5 PTS8 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Aaliyah Edwards Over 11.5 PTS8 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kiki Iriafen Over 15.5 PTS4 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Charlisse Leger-Walker Over 7.5 PTS7 vs 7.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair number
- Charlisse Leger-Walker Over 3.5 AST3 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairpaid over the fair numberLeger-Walker came up one assist short despite playing 30 minutes, held back by low offensive involvement at just 14% usage and a 3-8 shooting night that limited her ability to create offense. She finished with exactly 3 dimes, falling one short of the over due to her reduced playmaking opportunities in a blowout loss.
- Kiki Iriafen Over 9.5 REB5 vs 9.5paid over the fair numberIriafen fell well short with just 5 rebounds due to a combination of limited minutes (18) and early foul trouble (5 PF), which restricted her ability to crash the glass and accumulate the volume needed to clear 9.5.
TOR @ CHI5–6−1.84u
- Sydney Taylor Under 14.5 PTS18 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kamilla Cardoso Over 7.5 REB7 vs 7.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Isabelle Harrison Under 14.5 PTS21 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kiki Rice Over 14.5 PTS9 vs 14.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Sydney Taylor Under 15.5 PTS18 vs 15.5shots didn't fall — the read held upTaylor exceeded the under with efficient shooting, going 5-12 from the field (42%) with a perfect 5-5 from free throw while maintaining 31% usage over 24 minutes. Her 63% true shooting and aggressive free throw attempts (5 attempts) proved the scoring floor was higher than the 15.5-point line anticipated.
- Kiki Rice Over 13.5 PTS9 vs 13.5no clean explanationRice's inefficient 4-11 shooting (36% FG) and lack of free-throw attempts (0-0 FT) left her 4.5 points short despite playing 30 minutes with solid usage; her poor 41% true shooting prevented her from reaching 13.5 even with meaningful playing time.
MIN @ IND12–6+3.47u
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 26.5 PTS20 vs 26.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Natasha Howard Over 6.5 REB5 vs 6.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 25.5 PTS20 vs 25.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Natasha Howard Over 11.5 PTS6 vs 11.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHoward played just 12 minutes and shot 2-for-5 from the field, combining for only 6 points well short of the 11.5 target; limited run and inefficient scoring made the over impossible to hit.
- Natasha Howard Over 10.5 PTS6 vs 10.5shots didn't fall — the read held upHoward played just 12 minutes and shot 2-for-5 from the field, limiting her to 6 points well short of the 10.5 line; the minimal playing time and modest usage rate (27%) prevented her from accumulating scoring opportunities.
- Natasha Howard Over 9.5 PTS6 vs 9.5no clean explanationHoward logged just 12 minutes and converted only 2 of 5 field-goal attempts (40% FG), falling 3.5 points short of the over despite a decent efficiency rate; limited playing time was the primary constraint, as she couldn't generate enough volume to reach double figures.
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.