← form_wnba · WNBA
2026-09-24
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: form_wnba.
7–12 · 37% · −6.89u across the last 1 days
09/247–1237%−6.89u3 games
IND @ MIN0–7−7.00u
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 24.5 PTS10 vs 24.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 2.5 3PM2 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Caitlin Clark Over 2.5 3PM0 vs 2.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Caitlin Clark Over 21.5 PTS2 vs 21.5paid over the fair numberClark shot 1-12 from the field and 0-7 from three, combining for just 2 points in 18 minutes despite 30% usage, as historically poor efficiency derailed the over by 19.5 points. The 8% true shooting percentage was the primary culprit—she simply couldn't convert looks that were available within her usage rate.
- Caitlin Clark Over 20.5 PTS2 vs 20.5paid over the fair numberClark shot 1-12 from the field and 0-7 from three despite 30% usage, posting an 8% true shooting percentage—a historically poor offensive night that made the 20.5-point line impossible to reach. Her 18 minutes of playing time compounded the issue, leaving her with insufficient volume to overcome the shooting collapse.
- Kelsey Mitchell Over 23.5 PTS10 vs 23.5no clean explanationMitchell shot just 3-12 from the field (25% FG) in 22 minutes, falling well short of the scoring volume needed to reach 24 points despite solid free-throw shooting (2-2). Her poor efficiency and limited opportunities combined to leave her 13.5 points short of the over.
LVA @ PHO2–3−1.58u
- Kahleah Copper Over 19.5 PTS18 vs 19.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Jackie Young Over 19.5 PTS5 vs 19.5no clean explanation
- Jackie Young Under 4.5 REB7 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held upYoung grabbed 7 rebounds despite a brutal 2-8 shooting night, as the Las Vegas offense stalled (15% usage) and forced her into extended floor time (34 min) where she accumulated boards on high volume attempts. The under missed because rebounding opportunity, not scoring efficiency, was the key variable—she was on the glass hunting for her own misses and her teammates' bricks.
CHI @ WAS5–2+1.69u
- Sydney Taylor Under 14.5 PTS16 vs 14.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Shakira Austin Under 3.5 AST5 vs 3.5no clean explanationAustin exceeded the assist line despite shooting 0-for-9 from the field, as her 23 minutes and 25% usage rate kept her involved in ball movement and decision-making even when her shot wasn't falling. She recorded 5 dimes on just 1 turnover, suggesting a facilitation-focused role that compensated for her offensive struggles.
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.