← pinn_devig · WNBA
2026-09-30
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: pinn_devig.
4–15 · 21% · −11.18u across the last 1 days
09/304–1521%−11.18u2 games
ATL @ WAS2–9−7.09u
- Georgia Amoore Under 3.5 AST4 vs 3.5 — missed by a hairshots didn't fall — the read held up
- Georgia Amoore Under 1.5 REB5 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- DeWanna Bonner Over 4.5 REB2 vs 4.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- DeWanna Bonner Over 8.5 PTS7 vs 8.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- DeWanna Bonner Over 1.5 AST0 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held upBonner's limited 14-minute run and low 20% usage rate gave her minimal playmaking opportunity, and she recorded zero assists despite shooting efficiently, resulting in a complete miss on the over. Foul trouble (3 PF) likely restricted her floor time and prevented the ball-handling role needed to accumulate assists.
- Angel Reese Over 12.5 REB7 vs 12.5shots didn't fall — the read held upReese fell well short of 12.5 rebounds with just 7 boards despite 28 minutes, as Chicago's 21-point win limited rebounding opportunities in a blowout where bench players saw extended run in garbage time.
GSV @ DAL2–6−4.10u
- Gabby Williams Under 16.5 PTS36 vs 16.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Awak Kuier Over 1.5 AST1 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Janelle Salaun Under 9.5 PTS11 vs 9.5shots didn't fall — the read held up
- Paige Bueckers Over 19.5 PTS10 vs 19.5shots didn't fall — the read held upBueckers' 10 points came on just 3-13 shooting (23% FG) despite playing all 43 minutes, as poor efficiency and low usage (18%) left her well short of the 19.5-point line. A 34% true shooting percentage—her lowest of the season—combined with limited volume kept her output at less than half her scoring threshold.
- Cecilia Zandalasini Over 1.5 REB1 vs 1.5shots didn't fall — the read held upZandalasini came up one rebound short despite efficient scoring (2-3 FG), held back by limited rebounding opportunities in just 19 minutes of play. Her 10% usage rate and relatively modest court time restricted her ability to crash the boards enough to hit the over.
- Gabby Williams Under 17.5 PTS36 vs 17.5paid over the fair numberWilliams torched the line with elite efficiency, shooting 12-23 from the field (52%) and a perfect 7-7 from the stripe while playing 37 minutes with 36% usage—nearly double the volume implied by a 17.5-point prop. Her 69% true shooting percentage and balanced scoring attack (5 threes, 7 assists) made the under an easy miss.
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.