← role_gated_lineedges · WNBA
2026-09-30
Day by day
Latest 1 graded days from the same CORE benchmark shown in the headline, charts and sheet: role_gated_lineedges.
64–36 · 64% · −17.54u across the last 1 days
09/3064–3664%−17.54u2 games
GSV @ DAL30–20−12.67u
- Paige Bueckers Over 14.5 PTS10 vs 14.5no clean explanationBueckers' 3-13 shooting (23% FG) and 34% true shooting despite logging 43 minutes left her well short of the over, as inefficient scoring and low usage (18%) prevented her from reaching 15 points needed.
- Paige Bueckers Over 17.5 PTS10 vs 17.5no clean explanationBueckers shot just 3-13 from the field (23%) despite logging 43 minutes, and her 18% usage rate kept her well below the scoring threshold needed to hit the over. A combination of poor efficiency and limited offensive involvement held her to 10 points, 7.5 shy of the line.
- Gabby Williams Under 19.5 PTS36 vs 19.5no clean explanationWilliams exploded for 36 points on an elite 69% true shooting (12-23 FG, 5-12 3PT, 7-7 FT) while commanding 36% usage over 37 minutes, nearly doubling the 19.5-point line with a career-caliber shooting performance.
- Jessica Shepard Over 9.5 PTS4 vs 9.5no clean explanationShepard played heavy minutes (41) but was nearly invisible on offense, shooting just 2-5 from the field and generating only 9% usage—well below her typical volume—to finish with just 4 points despite the extended run.
- Kayla Thornton Under 5.5 REB6 vs 5.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationThornton grabbed one more rebound than the line allowed, reaching 6 boards in 31 minutes despite modest 15% usage; she stayed out of foul trouble (2 PF) and remained on the floor for the full game to accumulate the extra glass.
- Maddy Siegrist Over 4.5 PTS2 vs 4.5game script — blowout or foul troubleSiegrist saw just 10 minutes of playing time and took only 2 field-goal attempts, limiting her scoring ceiling well below the 4.5-point line despite an efficient 50% true shooting mark. The minimal usage rate of 15% reflects she played a reserve role and didn't get the volume needed to reach the over.
ATL @ WAS34–16−4.87u
- Angel Reese Over 7.5 REB7 vs 7.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationReese fell one rebound short despite solid efficiency (7-8 FT, 65% TS) because she logged just 28 minutes and 21% usage in a blowout win, limiting her volume opportunities on the glass.
- Georgia Amoore Over 4.5 PTS2 vs 4.5no clean explanationAmoore's shot selection fell apart despite heavy minutes (28), going 1-5 from the field and 0-4 from three—a 20% true shooting rate that was far too low to reach even 5 points. Her 11% usage rate and struggles from beyond the arc, where she's typically reliable, left her stranded well short of the Over.
- Shakira Austin Over 5.5 REB3 vs 5.5no clean explanationAustin played 32 minutes but grabbed only 3 rebounds despite 19% usage, falling well short of the 5.5 line—a combination of limited offensive opportunities (3-9 FG) and inefficiency that prevented her from crashing the glass at her typical rate.
- Shakira Austin Over 9.5 PTS9 vs 9.5 — missed by a hairno clean explanationAustin fell one point short despite playing 32 minutes, held back by inefficient 3-9 shooting (33% FG) that limited her to just 9 points despite solid free-throw conversion (2-2). The low-volume shooting night—likely a product of 19% usage and defensive coverage—prevented her from reaching double figures.
- Georgia Amoore Over 7.5 PTS2 vs 7.5shots didn't fall — the read held upAmoore's catastrophic 1-5 shooting (20% TS) and 0-4 from three—combined with just 11% usage despite 28 minutes—left her well short of 7.5 points; she scored only 2 and couldn't generate offensive opportunities even with extended floor time.
- Jordin Canada Under 3.5 REB7 vs 3.5paid over the fair numberCanada nearly doubled the projection with 7 rebounds in 35 minutes, significantly outpacing her season averages likely due to extended floor time and elevated usage in a blowout win (+23) where she played heavy minutes without foul trouble (4 PF).
Each eligible priced formula signal is normalized to a flat 1-unit outcome at its recorded price. Voids are excluded from the record, hit rate, and units. Open a day for the per-game split and loss review.